Welcome!

HOME
The Pan-Africanist International ACL seeks to build a website that, with your help and support, may soon become a clearing house of information on the identification, defence and advancement of the interests of Main Street Africa.
We do this through focusing attention, stimulating reflection, and enhancing informed responses on the following:
I/ RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS
II/ FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION: CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA
III/ NETWORKING FOR EFFECTIVE AMBUSHING OF AN IMMINENT HISTORICAL CONJUNCTION
IV/ UPHOLDING THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE
V/ CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY BETWEEN AFRICANS AND AFRICANS IN THE DIAPORA, AND AFRICA AND THE REST OF WORLD•

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

The Ecology

Biodiversity
Climate Change
Natural Disasters
Deforestation
Desertification
Genetically Modified Organisms
Sustainable Agriculture
Industrial Pollution
Dumping of Toxic Substances
Bush Fires
Waste Management and Disposal



  • RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS •

• FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

• EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

• THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

• CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •

Social: Real and present dangers...

Unemployment Brain Drain
Rural Urban Migration
Les Sans Papiers, Refugees and Asylum Seekers
Rule of Law and the Respect for Human Rights
Universal Adult Suffrage
Senior Citizens
Women and Children
Prisons, Crime and Drugs
Culture and Sports
Racism, ethnocentrism, and xenophobia
Communications
Shelter and Clothing
Transport
  • Road/Motor Traffic Accidents


  • RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS •

• FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

• EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

• THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

• CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •


    Food Sovereignty and Security/ Real and present dangers...

     

     

     

       

      How can Africa grow more food?

      Rising food prices are focusing minds on Africa's agricultural output, and on whether or not technology is the best way to boost production
      africa farming
      Food production in Africa is 10% lower than it was in 1960. Photograph: Howard Burditt/Reuters African agriculture has become the focus of extraordinary attention and interest. Yesterday a big report was launched by the Harvard academic Calestous Juma with the backing of several African presidents, and next week Chatham House in London is hosting a major conference on food security where the International Fund for Agriculture and Development (Ifad) is launching a new report on rural poverty.
      Meanwhile Olivier De Schutter, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, warned that the current UN climate summit in Cancun needs to launch a "Green Marshall Plan for Agriculture" or risk a possible 40% increase in emissions by 2030 if current agricultural methods are extended.
      Rising food prices and terrible future scenarios of the impact of climate change on food production, are focusing minds on what is perceived as Africa's huge untapped potential for agriculture. This week yet another report from the International Food Policy Research Institute warns that climate change could push prices up by 130%, and calls for unprecedented human ingenuity to meet the challenge of feeding a burgeoning population.

      REPORT: FOOD PRODUCTION WILL REMAIN AT THE SAME LEVEL FOR THE NEXT DECADE



      "


      Today, IFAD President released The Rural Poverty Report 2011 at Chatham House in London, #rpr2011



      Posted by Roxanna Samii Monday, December 6, 2010






      Here is our big day. We are launching the Rural Poverty Report 2011. The report is the result of two years of extensive work.




      To make sure that nothing would go wrong, I  went down early to the plenary hall of Chatham House to get myself  organized to find out to the my biggest chagrin that there was no  internet access in the plenary hall. PANIC, total PANIC. I pulled out my  Blackberry, more PANIC, no signal!!




      Deep breath, think and think fast. Rushed  upstairs to do as much as I could do  before the meeting started. After  putting in place the contingency plan and coming to terms with my  constraint, I headed back downstairs.




      At 9:33, David Nabarro welcomed the  participants and opened the “Food Security 2010 – Making Food Security  work: Matching supply to demand. More...



      The Multifunctionality of Agriculture
      WTO Agreement on Agriculture
      GM Crops and Foods
      Food Subsidy and local economies
      Corporate, Foreign Government land grab
      The Right To Water


        • RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS •

      • FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
      CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

      • EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
      AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

      • THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
      OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

      • CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •

      The Multifunctionality of Agriculture: Real and present dangers...


      "Idea that agriculture has many functions in addition to producing food and fibre, e.g. environmental protection, landscape preservation, rural employment, food security, etc." - WTO Glossary

      Multifunctionality in agriculture
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


      Multifunctionality in agriculture (often simply multifunctionality) refers to the numerous benefits that agricultural policies may provide for a country or region. Generally speaking, multifunctionality refers to the non-trade benefits of agriculture, that is, benefits other than commerce and food production.[1] These include, in the WTO definition of multifunctionality, environmental protection, landscape preservation, rural employment, and food security.[2] These can be broadly classified as benefits to society, culture, a national economy as a whole, national security, and other concerns. For example, in addition to providing food and plant-derived products for the population, agriculture may also have provide jobs for rural people and contribute to the viability of the area, create a more stable food supply, and provide other desired environmental and rural outputs.[3]

      "We must value the multiple functions of farms in the Third World if we are to achieve a sustainable agriculture, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (1999):
      To face the current challenges of agriculture, we need to address agriculture and land in a broader context by integrating multiple roles (economic, food production, nature and land management, employment etc.). Sustainable agriculture and land use is not just a means to obtain more food and income, in socially acceptable ways which do not degrade the environment. Rather, it has an all-encompassing impact on communities, environments, and consumers. We must reach a consensus and common understanding of sustainable land use as an opportunity to improve the quality of the environment, including its physical (increased soil fertility, better quality air and water), biological (healthier and more diverse animal, plant, and human populations), and social, economic and institutional (greater social equity, cohesion, peace/stability, well-being) components... Land is not just a resource to be exploited, but a crucial vehicle for the achievement of improved socioeconomic, biological and physical environments. Concretely, by paying attention to the multiple functions of agriculture and land use, all economic, social and environmental functions of agriculture, at multiple levels, are recognized and included in decision making in order to promote synergies between these functions and to reconcile different stakeholder objectives.
      The Multiple Functions and Benefits of Small Farm Agriculture
      In the Context of Global Trade Negotiations





      Summary
      In this Policy Brief I challenge the conventional wisdom that small farms are backward and unproductive. Using evidence from Southern and Northern countries I demonstrate that small farms are "multi-functional" —more productive, more efficient, and contribute more to economic development than large farms. Small farmers can also make better stewards of natural resources, conserving biodiversity and safe-guarding the future sustainability of agricultural production.

      The on-going process of trade liberalization —now being taken a step further in the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations for the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) —has already had dramatically negative effects on small farmers everywhere. The AoA has the potential to severely undercut the remaining viability of small farm production, with potentially devastating consequences for rural economies and environments worldwide. I conclude with a call to recognize the true multi-functional role and value of small farmers, and to unite in opposition to an AoA that might make their continued existence impossible.

      Introduction
      For more than a century mainstream economists in both capitalist and socialist countries have confidently and enthusiastically predicted the demise of the small, family farm. Small farms have time and again been labeled as backward, unproductive and inefficient —an obstacle to be overcome in the process of economic development. The American model of large scale, mechanized, corporate agriculture is held out as the best, if not the only way to efficiently feed the world's population. Small farmers —or "peasants" —have been expected to go the way of the dinosaurs, and rightly so, according to conventional wisdom.
      In this Policy Brief I challenge the conventional wisdom about small farms and assert that they are "multi-functional" — more productive, more efficient, and contribute more to economic development than large farms. I argue that small farmers make better stewards of natural resources, conserving biodiversity and better safe-guarding the sustainability of production. The evidence I present evidence comes from both the Third World and from industrialized countries like the United States.

      Today's on-going process of liberalization in international agricultural trade — now being taken a step further in the Millennium Round of World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations —is widely recognized to have dramatically negative effects on small farmers in both Northern and Southern countries. This puts the small farm issue — called The Agrarian Question by renowned social scientist Karl Kautsky at the beginning of this century—squarely on the agenda for debate at the end of the millennium.

      If small farms are worth preserving —if indeed a small farm model of rural development makes more sense than does the large-scale, mechanized, chemical intensive, corporate dominated and socially excluding model toward which business-as-usual is carrying us—then now is the time to act.

      The first point worth noting is that while small farmers have been driven out of rural America by the millions, and we have seen a similar, though lessor rural-urban migration in the Third World, the fact is that family farmers do still persist in the U.S. and continue to be numerically dominant. In the Third World they are central to the production of staple foods. The prediction of their demise continues to be premature, though their numbers have dropped substantially and they face new threats to their livelihoods on an unprecedented scale.
      The second point is that small farms are far from being as unproductive or inefficient as so many would have us believe. Peasants have stubbornly clung to the land despite more than a century of harsh policies which have undercut their economic viability.

      The third point is that small farms have multiple functions which benefit both society and the biosphere, and which contribute far more than just a particular commodity—though there is ample evidence that a small farm model for agricultural development could produce far more food than a large farm pattern ever could. These multiple and beneficial functions should be seriously valued and considered before we blithely accept yet another round of anti-small farm policy measures—this time at the level of the global economy. It is toward the second and third points—the benefits of small farms, that I direct the bulk of this paper.

      In the conclusion to this Policy Brief I outline the grave threat to small farms presented by the WTO negotiations for an Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). Several countries, led by the United States, seek to push further free trade in agricultural products. I show how this could lead to the destruction of small farms and severely damage rural environments worldwide.

      I close by issuing a call to rally around the concept of the multiple functionality of small farms, for both human societies and for the biosphere. By recognizing the important role played by small farms we have an opportunity to stop and even reverse trade policies which erode the viability of small farms. More...

      This Policy Brief was prepared for "Cultivating Our Futures," the FAO/Netherlands Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land, 12-17 September 1999, Maastricht, The Netherlands.


      Download in PDF 
      Peter M. Rosset, Ph.D.
      Executive Director
      Food First/The Institute for Food and Development Policy
      Oakland, CA USA

      Co-published by:
      Transnational Institute
      Paulus Potterstraat 20
      1071 DA, Amsterdam
      The Netherlands

      Tel: 31-20-6626608 Fax: 31-20-6757176
      Email: tni@tni.org
      Website: http://www.worldcom.nl/tni

       
      Contents
      Summary
      Introduction
      Small Farm Productivity
      Small Farms in Economic Development
      Ecosystem Services and Sustainability
      Conclusion: Free Trade Threatens Small Farm Agriculture
      Bibliography

      External links:

      * Food First/The Institute for Food and Development Policy
      * Multifuntionality: OECD Department for Trade and Agriculture
      * WTO Glossary - Multifunctionality



        I/ RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS • 

      a/ Food Sovereignty and Security

      a/ Food Sovereignty and Security

      b/ Social


      c/ The Ecology


      d/ Health

      e/ Education


      f/ Peace and Security
       
      g/ The Wealth of Africa

      • FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
      CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

      • EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
      AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

      • THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
      OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

      • CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •

      Sunday, October 31, 2010

      Hot-beds of Tension: Real and present dangers

      Hot-beds of Tension:

      • RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS •

      • FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
      CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

      • EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
      AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

      • THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
      OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

      • CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •

        RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS

        -DRAFT-

        So far as the Real And Present Dangers facing the people of the African continent are awaiting no excuses in order to strike, the African people owe no one any excuses in order to respond and reverse these threats by any means necessary. The alternative is to risk paying with our lives, water, health, education facilities, peace, and social progress. To effectively confront the kind of challenges and levels of threats we face today as a people, we need the urgent involvement of each and every one of us in remaining vigilant, well-informed, and active in the intensive public debates on remedial actions, implications on institutional, social, and the anticipated behavioural changes.

        Above all, as a people whose only strength lies in our unity of action, consensus building among us is crucial in order to effectively respond and reverse these threats. We have reached a stage where it is simply suicidal to leave such matters exclusively in the hands a handful of good and dedicated individuals, surrounded by a park of opportunistic and corrupt professional politicians, state bureaucrats and various international players of doubtful intentions and abilities. The absence of people-to-people contacts and a grass root continental platform cannot simply be explained away as accident of history, but an indication of a paralysis or an indictment on all of us who identify ourselves with the forces of progress in Africa.

        Those who have everything to lose from our unity would naturally do their best to discourage and sabotage any such initiatives. There is no doubt that the neo-colonialist divide and rule tactic is not going to be voluntarily relaxed just for us to unite, even if our unity is needed to save us from extinction because of their inordinate and justifiable fear of what we could do with it afterwards, if successful. Our unity, just like our freedom and all the rest of our social and economic rights have to be fought for, and won. We simply cannot afford to lose the struggle for our unification. If we remain divided and unable to come together even to save our own lives, we are obviously a people without a future.

        Most remedial measures tend to avoid the obvious necessity to put the people whose lives and deaths this is all about, and whose involvement in solving the problems is indispensable in any effective measures, at the epicentre of the requisite changes and responses to these challenges. Africa is already paying a heavy price for the centuries of colonial partition, neo-colonialist bantustanisation and ossification into isolated and non-viable backwater states. Whilst the depth, scale, as well as the intensity required of such a long overdue continental engagement among the people themselves is unprecedented in the history of any people on the planet, it must also be carried out with break-neck speed if we are not to be overtaken by events.

        Thus, we do not have the luxury of isolated, sporadic and spontaneous responses as an option. And time is what we do not have. We need an urgent, systematic, comprehensive, organised and sustained responses for short, medium and long-term solutions. In order to properly respond, we have to know, at least, what is going on. How many of even our so-called leaders fully appreciate the magnitude of these challenges? Are we not supposed to play any role in our own salvation? Is it not strange that we do not even know much to make informed responses? What can ordinary people and individuals do about these challenges? How come in this age of information revolution, the concerned public are so much starved of information about Africa and her struggles for peace and dignity, and even for sheer survival? Who is listening to us? Should we not make them listen?

        How many of even our so-called leaders fully appreciate the magnitude of these challenges?
        Are we not supposed to play any role in our own salvation?
        Is it not strange that we do not even know much to make informed responses?
        How come in this age of information revolution, the concerned public are so much starved of information about Africa and her struggles for peace and dignity, and even for sheer survival?
        Who is listening to us? Should we not make them listen?
        What can ordinary people and individuals do about these challenges?

        In the news:

        The Right To Water
        GM Crops and Foods
        Corporate, Foreign Government land grab
        The United States Africa Command (US Africom)
        Climate Change and Climate Reparations
          • RESPONDING TO REAL AND PRESENT DANGERS •


        Food Sovereignty and Security

        Social

        The Ecology

        Health

        Education

        Peace and Security

        The Wealth of Africa


        • FACILITATING SELF-MOBILISATION •
        CHALLENGING DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

        • EFFECTIVE NETWORK •
        AMBUSHING AN IMMINENT CONJUNCTION

        • THE ENDURING IMPERATIVES •
        OF THE PAN-AFRICANIST STRUGGLE

        • CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY •

        Join US!



        We welcome your contributions. You can mail your articles, pictures, ideas, etc here. If you publish your own blog, send us a link and we'll add it to our blog-roll.


        We are living in a very decisive moment of history. Everything points to that, including the very survival of all forms of life on earth. The real problem is that not many people really bother about this enormous responsibility of our times. This is what makes it scary. We remain optimists though. Trouble is how much time have we got, if we can even help to make any difference?


        We feel it important to provide information on a number of relevant issues, including culture and media and we'll be launching regular campaigns on current issues. To advance communication, we'll be providing a forum where you can register and open your own topics.

        For those who wish to organise or help us get organized, please do. We'll be adding useful tools that will enable people to connect wherever they may be. One of these will be our magazine which we are going to publish on a regular basis. If you're an artist, photographer or wish to add your ideas, text and analyses, feel welcome.
        That's basically our message: we are here for you



        Comment:

        TOWARDS A NON-VIOLENT STRUGGLE FOR CHANGE IN AFRICA!

        "I completely agree with you on this:
        We are living in a very decisive moment of history. Everything points to that, including the very survival of all forms of life on earth. The real problem is that not many people really bother about this enormous responsibility of our times. This is what makes it scary. I remain an optimist though. Trouble is how much time have we got, if we can even help to make any difference?
        I like the idea of the website, and for articles and statements meant to have more permanence than most blog posts, I think you are exactly right with making things "as simple as possible and as detailed as you click".  The other thing is you want to do is to tell a story.  That usually means introduce the themes and any characters, say what you have to say with links for more details, and wrap it up by neatly and succinctly stating your conclusions, telling people the end of the story.  Everybody likes a good story.  The more your document reads like a good story and the less it reads like a manifesto the better.  Manifestos are important and necessary too.  But they should be short.
        Networking/Organizations/Movements:  Where movements come to grief is factions fighting among themselves.  As much as a movement or organization can allow for multiple points of view and a variety of approaches the better.   The more any group is doctrinaire, the more it undermines its own support and credibility. 
        I think it is critically important to be non violent as a political movement for credibility.  Violence backfires and discredits the movement, as in blowing up children and families.  Additionally violence gives immediate permission to act outside the law.  That usually leads very quickly to criminal activity, the drug and weapons trade, which are the same, kidnapping, terrorism, etc.  A lot of criminal activity goes on in the Niger Delta in the name of liberation, the IRA turned into a mostly criminal gang.  The crime and drug business is what many Latin American liberation movements became.  There are times for violent resistance.  I don't see any use or reason for it in Ghana at present.  It is very much a last resort.
        There are situations where violence is appropriate, as for instance, to eliminate warring criminal gangs that make life hell for the average citizen.  The danger here of course is that any military presence risks becoming just another one of the warring groups plaguing the population.  And there are occasional justifications for violent insurrections.  I'm not a pacifist, but I do not like to see lives wasted for nothing.   Most violent conflict is lives wasted for nothing."

        Followers